Honest comparison
The Storm Claim File compared with hiring an attorney
An attorney is the correct professional when the dispute is about coverage rather than amount, when the carrier's conduct may amount to bad faith, or when your suit limitation period is close or passed. The Storm Claim File is educational material for ordinary claims that are covered but underpaid. These are not competing products, and on the claims where an attorney is needed, this one tells you so.
| Hiring an attorney | The Storm Claim File | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Often contingency, commonly a third or more | $249 once |
| Right for a flat denial on causation | Yes | No |
| Right for a suspected bad faith claim | Yes | No |
| Right for a passed or near deadline | Yes, urgently | No |
| Right for a covered claim scoped too low | Often heavy-handed | Yes |
| Can advise on your state's law | Yes | No, and we say so |
| Can file suit | Yes | No |
Our verdict, including when the answer is not us
If your claim was denied outright on the basis that the damage was not storm-related, or if your suit limitation deadline is within a few months, close this page and get a consultation with a policyholder-side attorney in your state. That is the correct next step and no document replaces it. Module 08 of the File covers the thresholds in detail, and the free deadline calculator will tell you where you stand in about a minute.
We sell one of the two things on this page, so read it accordingly. Our independence statement sets out exactly what we do and do not earn from, and the free Claim Position Check will tell you when the answer is not to buy from us.